Vernacular and Environmentally Friendly Architecture Studies at the Mataram University Campus Building

Authors

  • Teti Handayani Fakultas Teknik Universitas Mataram
  • Rini Saptaningtyas Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Mataram
  • Zaedar Gazalba Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Mataram
  • Giska Pradana Ayu Putri Kamase Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Mataram
  • Jasmine Chanifah Uzdah Bachtiar Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Mataram
  • Ni Ketut Ayu Intan Putri Mentari Indriani Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/sade.v1i2.19

Keywords:

arsitektur ramah lingkungan, arsitektur vernakular, identitas kampus, Universitas Mataram

Abstract

In the last  decade, the  development of new buildings in Mataram University has shown a shift towards contemporary forms and materials which results a quite different facade / appearance from the existing buildings.  The situation raises an awareness that if it is allowed to continue, Mataram University as one of the state universities in West Nusa Tenggara will lose its identity. This study aims to examine the characteristics of vernacular and environmentally friendly architecture that can be applied to Mataram University’s building and evaluate it in the old and new buildings. This study uses a qualitative method, by reviewing the literature and evaluating the building based on the criteria obtained. The library building represents the old building and the Fisipol building represents the new building as subjects studied. Data analysis was done by descriptively qualitatively. The results show that the library building and Fisipol meet the same criteria or vernacular architectural characteristics even though visually the buildings look different. However, the library building meets the criteria for environmentally friendly architecture compared to Fisipol building, which is a new building. This study is expected to increase research on vernacular architecture as the identity of new campuses in Indonesia. This research still has many shortcomings, therefore it requires more similar studies in the future.

 

References

Amira, K. (2021, Januari 22). Biaya Kuliah di UNUD. Diakses dari https://beasiswa-id.net/biaya-kuliah-di-unud/.

Anggraeny, N. F., Antariksa, & Suryasari, N. (2011). Perubahan Bentuk Bangunan Bale Tani di Dusun Sade Lombok Tengah. Tesa, 9(2), 82–94.

Asyraf, M. H., & Budi, B. S. (2017). Analisis Penulis Mengenai Akulturasi Budaya pada Aula Timur ITB. Seminar Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia (IPLBI), A279–A284. https://doi.org/10.32315/sem.1.a279

Auliya, T., Surjono, & Antariksa. (2009). Permukiman Tradisional Suku Sasak di Dusun Senaru. Arsitektur E-Journal, 2(2), 120–129.

Dober, R. P. (1991). The Society for College and University Planning: Campus Design.

Ghotbi, A. A. (2008). The Concept of Identity and Modern Iranian Architecture. Aeiine Khial Journal, 10.

Krisna, R., Antariksa, & Rini Dwi Ari, I. (2005). Studi Pelestarian Kawasan Budaya di Dusun Sade Kabupaten Lombok Tengah. Jurnal Plannit, 3(2), 124–133.

Papanek, V. (1995). The Green Imperative: Ecology and Ethics in Design and Architecture. Thames and Hudson.

Pearson, D. (1994). Earth to Spirit. London: Chronicle Books.

Pujianto, F., & Yenny, G. (2017). Berugaq Sebagai Identitas Arsitektur Desa Tanah Petak Daye, Lombok Utara. Media Matrasain, 14(1), 12–22.

Raharja, I.G.M. (2010). Konsep Ruang yang Mendasari Desain Interior Rumah Tinggal Tradisional Bali Madya/Bali Arya II. Jurnal ISI Denpasar, 8, 1-3.

Sitorus, Y. F. E. (2017). Konsep Desain Atap Aula Timur dan Aula Barat Institut Teknologi Bandung. Seminar Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia (IPLBI), A027–A032. https://doi.org/10.32315/sem.1.a027

Suriastuti M.Z., Wahjudi D., Handoko B. (2014). Kajian Penerapan Konsep Kearifan Lokal pada Perancangan Arsitektur Balaikota Bandung, Jurnal Itenas Rekarupa 2 (1), 128.

Torabi, Z., & Brahman, S. (2013). Effective Factors in Shaping the Identity of Architecture. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 15 (1), 106-113.

Wiranto, (1999). Arsitektur Vernakular Indonesia: Perannya Dalam Pengembangan Jati Diri. DIMENSI TEKNIK ARSITEKTUR 27 (2), 15 – 20.

Published

2021-10-30

How to Cite

Handayani, T., Saptaningtyas, R., Gazalba, Z., Pradana Ayu Putri Kamase, G., Chanifah Uzdah Bachtiar, J., & Intan Putri Mentari Indriani, N. K. A. (2021). Vernacular and Environmentally Friendly Architecture Studies at the Mataram University Campus Building. Jurnal Arsitektur Dan Perencanaan Kota, 1(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.29303/sade.v1i2.19

Issue

Section

Artikel

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)