Analysis of Infrastructure Disparity in Central Settlement Areas

Authors

  • Lalu Muhammad Faqih Firmansyah Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Mataram
  • Hilma Luthfia Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Mataram
  • Ferawati Fajrin Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Mataram
  • Muhammad Julfi Zahari Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Mataram
  • Iva Nur Ilmi Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Mataram
  • Giska Ayu Pradana Putri Kamase Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/sade.v4i2.130

Keywords:

Infrastructure Disparities, Self-Built Settlement, Dasan Agung, kekalik Jaya, Urban Planning

Abstract

This study analyzes infrastructure disparities in the settlements of Dasan Agung and Kekalik in Mataram City. Although both are located in the city center, they exhibit different infrastructure conditions. The study compares the physical conditions and basic services in both areas and identifies the factors causing these disparities to support equitable and sustainable settlement planning. A qualitative-comparative case study method was used, involving observations and in-depth interviews. Quantitative analysis was conducted through scoring key infrastructure variables: roads, drainage, clean water, and electricity.

The results show that Dasan Agung has an average score of 29% (poor), while Kekalik Jaya scores 54% (fair). Although the total aggregate scores appear similar, the distribution of scores across indicators reveals significant disparities. Dasan Agung performs better in road layout, but its physical condition is poor due to lack of maintenance. Its drainage system frequently floods due to open and clogged channels, in contrast to Kekalik's more efficient system. While clean water and electricity scores are identical, Kekalik provides more stable and legal services.

These disparities are influenced by weak supervision and spatial planning policies that have not reached self-built settlements. The findings reflect Todaro and Smith’s theory and highlight obstacles to achieving SDGs 9 and 11.

References

Brundtland, (1987) World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED)

Kessides, C. (2006) Infrastructure Privatization and Regulation: Promises and Perils, World Bank Research Observer, 21(1), 81-108.

Kessides, C., 1993. “ The Contributions of infrastructure to Economic Development- A Review of Exoerience and Policy implications”, World Bank, Washington D.C

Nisyak, Q. I., Handoyo, P., Harianto, S. (2023) Kesenjangan Sosial Masyarakat Urban di Balik Pembangunan Infrastruktur Kota (Studi di Kecamatan Wiyung, Kota Surabaya, 15(2).

Panggarti, U., Zumaeroh, Purnomo, S. D., Part I: The right to the City and the Urban Revolution. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1), 6-17)

Rahayu, L., Korelasi Antara Kesenjangan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Jalan Dengan Kesejahteraan Penduduk di Indonesia. (2020), 3(1).

Retnowati, D., Adhitya, B. (2022) Studi Komparatif Ketimpangan Antar Pulau di Indonesia, Jurnal Ekonomi, 24(2), 288-298.

Sihombing, L., A., Utami, F., C., (2023) Hirarki dan Distribusi Kota: Penyebaran, dan Kepadatan Penduduk Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Infrastruktur, Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik, 5(2).

Soja, E.W. (2010) Spatializing the Urban,

Sukwika, T. (2018) Peran Pembangunan Infrastruktur Terhadap Ketimpangan Ekonomi Antarwilayah di Indonesia, Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan, 6(2), 115-130.

Wilonoyudho, S., (2009) Kesenjangan Dalam Pembangunan Kewilayahan, 23(2).

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

Firmansyah, L. M. F., Luthfia, H. ., Fajrin, F., Zahari, M. J., Ilmi, I. N., & Kamase, G. A. P. P. (2026). Analysis of Infrastructure Disparity in Central Settlement Areas. Jurnal Arsitektur Dan Perencanaan Kota, 4(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.29303/sade.v4i2.130

Issue

Section

Artikel

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)